tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post114547532651193357..comments2023-10-17T06:26:31.005-07:00Comments on Evolutionary Middleman: Earliest Known SnakeJohn Evohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-1145556846862171662006-04-20T11:14:00.000-07:002006-04-20T11:14:00.000-07:00"That thing looks like a fish not a snake."OK! It..."That thing looks like a fish not a snake."<BR/><BR/>OK! It's a FISH with hips!John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-1145556780421507042006-04-20T11:13:00.000-07:002006-04-20T11:13:00.000-07:00McKiernan said: "So wouldn’t you think, John, that...McKiernan said: "So wouldn’t you think, John, that the answers to all of your questions are actually not all answerable?"<BR/><BR/>Yes.<BR/><BR/>And despite you (perhaps) trying to 'get me going' we are actually in complete agreement for a change! Loved your comment.John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-1145553111008129242006-04-20T10:11:00.000-07:002006-04-20T10:11:00.000-07:00That thing looks like a fish not a snake. What mea...That thing looks like a fish not a snake. What measuring device did they use to inform that it is 90 million years old ? And why should anyone believe them ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-1145549274525029282006-04-20T09:07:00.000-07:002006-04-20T09:07:00.000-07:00See, I would like the answers to all of these que...<I>See, I would like the answers to all of these questions EVEN IF there is design. But ID doesn't offer me that. Apparently, if it was designed - then "good enough" and end of discussion!</I><BR/><BR/>Science is intent on finding the missing forms that connect competing species. ID accepts the science of science and is looking for God in between the missing forms. Evolution and ID end up with Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-1145506187584480052006-04-19T21:09:00.000-07:002006-04-19T21:09:00.000-07:00"A 9 million year old snake? Sounds our friend McK..."A 9 million year old snake? Sounds our friend McKiernan:) (just kidding Mack, relax!)"<BR/><BR/>NINETY million, Hank! Going back to the last 25 million years or so of the Dino's (and probably closer in age to McKiernan). <BR/><BR/>I don't know what to recommend. Here's MY problem (and it REALLY IS, 'my problem')... intuitively, I'm so utterly convinced of the fact of evolution, that unless John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-1145483875717250262006-04-19T14:57:00.000-07:002006-04-19T14:57:00.000-07:00Hey JB,A 9 million year old snake? Sounds our frie...Hey JB,<BR/><BR/>A 9 million year old snake? Sounds our friend McKiernan:) (just kidding Mack, relax!)<BR/><BR/>Lemme ask you this, John. Let's say a person was neutral and open-minded on this issue -- Do you think it would be a good idea to read <A HREF="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?z=y&isbn=0192860925&itm=3" REL="nofollow">Selfish Gene </A> by Dawkins and <A HREF=Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com