tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post4888687460464836136..comments2023-10-17T06:26:31.005-07:00Comments on Evolutionary Middleman: The "Accommodation Wars"John Evohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-55403920386537099742009-06-27T22:17:38.497-07:002009-06-27T22:17:38.497-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-64967168617169821802009-06-27T08:05:33.197-07:002009-06-27T08:05:33.197-07:00Evo, you crack me up.Evo, you crack me up.Spanish Inquisitorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05261181794832002207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-2704478758146877742009-06-26T20:20:50.307-07:002009-06-26T20:20:50.307-07:00Yet, we're (Christians) are supposed to believ...<i>Yet, we're (Christians) are supposed to believe that He fries people for eternity? Give me a fucking break, awready!</i><br /><br />I hear you man. That is just *nutty*! It's amazing what people will believe, huh?John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-72253948492967801692009-06-26T20:06:52.521-07:002009-06-26T20:06:52.521-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-18176865904028580622009-06-25T16:36:47.674-07:002009-06-25T16:36:47.674-07:00I must be, Gideon. I'm the only one you call ...I must be, Gideon. I'm the only one you call by actual name, rather than one of your oh-so-clever reworks on their name. Thanks for your abiding respect. I'll make a rationalist out of you yet. Imagine you using your enthusiasm to tell Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, etc. that they are foolish for believing man-made fantasies. I can see it.John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-57108016299158620162009-06-24T22:45:28.773-07:002009-06-24T22:45:28.773-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-88248435478036889022009-06-23T20:09:32.857-07:002009-06-23T20:09:32.857-07:00You know, after dealing with cl, and reading Gideo...You know, after dealing with cl, and reading Gideon, at least cl <i>sounds</i> like he makes sense.Spanish Inquisitorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05261181794832002207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-2556890998093226822009-06-23T10:14:55.714-07:002009-06-23T10:14:55.714-07:00I'm sure 90% of the people who might chance to...I'm sure 90% of the people who might chance to read my last comment (what *is* 90% of zero, by the way?) will have a much better ability to understand it than you have.<br /><br />Hey! Didn't I tell you that you are only allowed to go around farting on peoples' blogs on *weekends*? What's up, Jr? You've been so good at following orders recently! Don't fall off the John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-71741452507627100882009-06-23T04:38:55.480-07:002009-06-23T04:38:55.480-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-44704596770636926792009-06-21T18:28:31.118-07:002009-06-21T18:28:31.118-07:00You keep missing the point. Dawkins doesn't n...You keep missing the point. Dawkins doesn't need to shut up about his atheism, unless he is *basing* science on it. That would be inappropriate. Just as it's inappropriate to tell theists that religion is compatible with science.<br /><br /><i>Remember, this is the guy you feel to be infallible</i>!<br /><br />Straw man. Never said it; don't believe it. <br /><br />It doesn't John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-68305707780974311402009-06-21T13:50:44.557-07:002009-06-21T13:50:44.557-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-48564437215592884082009-06-21T11:52:32.169-07:002009-06-21T11:52:32.169-07:00Gid,
Dawkins isn't pushing religion. He's...Gid,<br /><br />Dawkins isn't pushing religion. He's pushing rational thought and evidence-based reality. You don't have to believe him. And apparently you don't, so there isn't any issue here. That you equate what he says with religion suggests that you are clueless about the arguments made here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-21766632243972962482009-06-21T09:43:44.200-07:002009-06-21T09:43:44.200-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-33834341906456969992009-06-18T13:59:59.277-07:002009-06-18T13:59:59.277-07:00Coyne addresses some of these very points if you r...Coyne addresses some of these very points if you read my "update 1" on this post.John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-64481699079460188502009-06-18T10:22:15.953-07:002009-06-18T10:22:15.953-07:00I don't think science has any real reason for ...I don't think science has any real reason for saying anything one way or the other regarding religion, so in that sense I have no problem with the separate magisteria crap. The issue, as I see it, is actually with religion trespassing on science's turf, in which case science should have every right to say, "get off my lawn!"<br /><br />Individuals can say religion is crap or PhillyChiefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03355892225956705948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-52460215809339827362009-06-18T09:38:50.157-07:002009-06-18T09:38:50.157-07:00I totally agree, Philly, and I think Coyne does to...I totally agree, Philly, and I think Coyne does too!<br /><br />The point is not about what Miller can and can not effectively quarter in some remote area of his brain. It's about the message that he and others are putting out to others - That people like Coyne (and you and me) should studiously avoid pointing out to others the fatal flaws in thinking science and religion are two perfectly John Evohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10868904051881865159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15599022.post-23066618614889633372009-06-17T12:33:51.221-07:002009-06-17T12:33:51.221-07:00I might have been mistaken about being wrong befor...I might have been mistaken about being wrong before.<br /><br /><br />I really don't see what the big fuss is. Religion should be a private matter, like drinking. You do it on your own time, not at work, and work doesn't halt or change to accommodate yours or anyone else's need to imbibe. If your drinking or religioning gets in the way of doing your job, then see ya. <br /><br />PhillyChiefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03355892225956705948noreply@blogger.com